In many instances throughout human history mass killings of
people (innocent or not) were done for a certain purpose by the hands psychopaths,
Kings, rulers, authoritative figures, or by people who have the belief it’s for
the common good. We’ve learn from our past that those methods may not be the
correct response to delicate situations such as what’s going on the Middle
East, however we still don’t utilize those teachings. Using drones have
employed a way for American soldiers to be safe during harmful combatant situations,
and initiated a way for death strikes on high profile threats. Those
achievements are commendable. However, the deaths of innocent who were there at
the wrong place at the wrong time are not because it devalues human lives. The
idea of killing 4 to 5 people just for 1 target seems not only murder, but also
an in violation of human rights that the USA government holds dear. What was
shocking for me is without a positive ID on a target, a kill order can be given
where potentially innocent civilians killed. In recent years a stereotype for
many Muslims, Arabs, and other Middle Eastern groups have been called
“barbaric”, but what the USA government allows these death strikes on significant
amount of innocent civilians seems to be more Barbaric.
What has to
change is the communication between USA and Pakistan/Afghanistan; to reduce the
use of drones. Technology makes it easy for America to have an upper hand
between them and their enemies. However, this shortcut can’t stop the war and
cant stop the distrust towards America from other countries. In the Islamic
perspective, if one is wrongly killed, the victim’s family has the right for
compensation from the accused killer. The fact that American personnel are
those who give the order and pulled the trigger cant be accountable, the family
of the victim will resist any efforts to support them. In fact, most likely
going to create more “terrorist” as retaliation. Understandably the drones are
important tool for the army to use for surveillances and combat situations,
paraphrasing that they are the only tools they have, it is disturbingly wrong
to use drones as a direct approach on War on Terror. It is inaccurate that we
Americans have drones as our only tool; we have another tool called our voices.
I am fascinated by how much of the disgust over UAV use seems to be linked to its whiff of "dishonor." There appears to be a connection between the perceived ease of the technology's use and its status as somehow "cheating" or devaluing human life (another equation that lurks below these discussions implies that taking human life means you should suffer some kind of compensatory hardship, whether physical or mental).
ReplyDelete