With unmanned missiles and weapons
systems becoming an increasing reality, the future for a world with autonomous
war weapons is an urgent political and ethical concern. Robert Sparrow’s
article, Predators or Plowshares?, illuminates the very real threat of a
weapons system that can initiate conflict on “accident” as soon as this is
considered an advantage. However the current model for war turns human soldiers
into similarly autonomous machines that are trained to kill without considering
consequences. This industrial nature of converting humans into machines seems
exacerbated by removing all sensibilities of having to perform violent tasks
behind a computer screen across the world. Many of these fears are similar to
the same concerns following the Vietnam War with popular action films such as
Rambo or Robocop that would pit this kind of war industrial complex against the
rationality of human consciousness. These UAV systems will be forced to be held
under global control otherwise countries that ignore the ethical consequences
of creating an autonomous army will have the capability of unplanned and
accidental destruction of regions of the world. Military responsibility must become
an issue that the world population must begin to acknowledge similar to the
fears surrounding nuclear weapons following World War 2. Hopefully UMS arms
control can become a reality before these types of weapons are tried in a war
simply to understand potential consequences. Hiroshima and Nagasaki should
serve as ongoing reminders that massive destruction during warfare is not
necessary to assert dominance in the global community. While the rest of the world seems to be racing in order to develop their own nuclear weapons, Japan has refrained from creating this kind of weapon to demonstrate a more peaceful stance in international negotiation. Although some argue that they are only in this position because of protection from countries that possess these weapons, Japan advocates diplomatic resolution over engaging in further military industrialization. Hopefully the rest of the world can abide by a similar goal for the future rather than furthering their necessity to grow economies off of the profits from a military complex.
Jonathan, I appreciate your comparison between the current military-industrial technological precipice and the historical anxiety surrounding the development of nuclear weapons. You're right to see parallels between fears over the "push-button" nature of nukes and targeted drone killings, though some might argue the differences in scale and accuracy are quite large.
ReplyDeleteEven as I write this, the Senate is about to convene a hearing on the government's drone policy, in an attempt to open this murky, much guarded area to public discussion: Drone Wars: The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing.