HAL
9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey is a symbol of the worst-case scenario of
artificially intelligent computers and their relationship with Humanity.
In which the narrative serves theme.
I
think the concern of resistance to AI begins before the digital age
itself. If we look to Science Fiction
writing we can find
early doubts and uneasiness with mans
relationship t machines. The doubts in the minds of a generation of writers
have echoes of distrust of the Modern and from the rise of the Atomic Age,
sci-fi dealt with annihilation by machine (although certainly this is countered
by what we can label “optimist” sci-fi; star trek, etc.)
AI is
commonly associated with an ultimate evil. A
central theme of Science Fiction writing is that rational thought without
emotion is dangerous. The human mind,
untethered from the body-and by extension the web of psychological, social, and emotional need-will eventually rely only on its intelligence, breeding
arrogance, hubris, a revolt against what is human, and deny any connection to their human counterparts and set about destroying them. This is really an old parable about hubris
and over-dependence on technology (Icarus rejects his father, took refuge in
technology, falls to earth, while Faust casts his lot with the scientific and pays with his soul).
I
enjoyed how Kubrick grounded the narrative in a sleek contemporary aesthetic, a slightly hyper-real version of everyday life in
1968. While the stewardesses in pillbox hats and the back-slappin' bonhomie of
the characters-Somewhere between a Brylcream ad and a stroll through Bedford
Falls seems corny to us, pretty gosh darn cool in 1968. More importantly
it was entirely plausible that the future would look familiar to
us, a staple of many Sci Fi narratives, and the obvious set-up for the final act when Hal rebels. In a
setting where nothing could possibly go wrong and superintelligences have
sorted out all the problems, the likely thing to go wrong is a machine itself.
And
when it learns, it becomes a Superintelligence. It will accumulate a base of knowledge the builds upon itself, eventually knowing more
than humans, though nurtured by humans, evolves beyond the comprehension of humans and lacking any empathy, turns on them.
2001 is a work of fiction, and Turing's influence on Kubrick is evident.
The
link between2001 and Turing is well established. I.J. Good, who worked under Turning as a
cryptologist (enigma machine stuff in England during World War II) he went on
to publish several articles and consulted with Kubrick on the "design" of HAL 9000.
The
interesting thing here is that the concept of an “Intelligence Explosion” was
pioneered by (guess who?) a science fiction writer. Vernor Vinge came up with
the idea of superintelligences, both AI and via human biological enhancement.
Good
takes it further, stating:
"Let an ultra intelligent
machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual
activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of
these intellectual activities, an ultra intelligent machine could design even
better machines; there would then unquestionably be an 'intelligence
explosion,' and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus the
first ultra intelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make."
Enter
HAL9000 stage left.
Some interesting reflections here, Josh, and you are right to point to a long history of anxieties over technology and nonhuman intelligence (don't forget the animal, as well). You point to one narrative that sees rationality devoid of emotion as dangerous, but doesn't 2001 seem to gesture in another direction, as well? HAL arguably commits murder because he is afraid, while the human astronauts show remarkably little emotion (it always creeps me out when Dave goes out to retrieve Frank but doesn't react at all, otherwise).
ReplyDelete