In the Time article, Constructing Artificial Intelligence,
Edwards constructs an argument based on the evolving technology of the digital
computer from 1950. The ability to code in a computer language that followed a
logical sequence allowed for speculation on the power of artificial
intelligence to automate response and perform decisions with increasingly less
human input. The Turing Machine is targeted as one of the first all purpose
computers that could perform logical functions, however its ability to only
interpret language through an analog sequence prevented decisions that were not
already determined by a human companion. The theoretical need to create a
“brain” for the computer led to discovering a language system that could make
logical decisions and then read the system as programmed led to the binary
coding system.
The
creation of the digital computer relied on the theoretical concept of a cyborg
mirrored after the decision making of its human creator. The relationship
between the logical decisions of the human brain and the decisions that needed
to be performed by the computer allows for technology to eventually catch up
with human functionality. The Dartmouth Conference highlights these potential
goals as the researchers Newell and Simon already predict that the computer
will have the potential to become a “world chess champion,” “compose
aesthetically valuable music,” and “discover and prove an important unknown
mathematical theorem” in only 10 years given the potential of digital coding. These
predictions are mostly impressive because the creation of music and playing a
game seemingly relies on creativity rather than an automated system of logic.
In hindsight, the computer has led to all of these feats while also pushing the
boundaries for human cognitive potential to compete with the improving
intelligence of the computer.
Jonathan, just a note of correction... the Edwards chapter on AI is actually from his book called The Closed World, not Time magazine (the image that starts the chapter is just one he included that shows a cover from a historic moment in computing). As for the rest, the Dartmouth Conference participants may have been prescient about the potential uses of the computer, but I've heard some funny stories from Sherry Turkle (at MIT) about how bad the early computer scientists there were at predicting uses for personal computers... in meetings, they came up with things like games and calendaring, but failed to see the potential in things like e-mail and word processing!
ReplyDelete