The modern day computer, which most of the world population
appreciates because of its usefulness of resources and communication, was not
conceived by the motivation for search of knowledge, but by fear of war. In an eerie thought, if the country/government weren’t involved with wars, we probably
wouldn’t have our modern day tech. The need for enhancing our defense via
technology is a necessity in order for ourselves and the country to feel safe.
With that said, this can go a little too far by having weapons developed using
technology, we don’t want The Terminator
to be our future. I can see the potential good warfare has created for new
computer system where a soldier’s life isn’t in peril. With these new advances,
it soon becomes the archetype for a newer safer computer system for everyday
people to use as a tool.
Creating
the early computer didn’t just help America win wars, it also created
nationalism among its people. When the American government funded universities
to help develop new computing systems, this allowed hundreds of people who
didn’t work for the government contribute in becoming stronger. Government and
technology may lead to a dark path (fighting wars), but it also can lead to a
better way of life with its positive effects of further researching science and
engineering. What helps the government further these studies is the people who
help create, learn, and gain national pride by working together. Who
else, but the original computer (humans) can help create a computing system.
Syed, I'm glad you are pointing to the connections between technology and nationalism... I think this is a thread we could fruitfully pursue further in class discussion. The Edwards reading is from his book about "computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America," and clearly is interested in the military origins of computing technology, but I like that you also attach government funding of educational institutions and research to these other nexuses.
ReplyDelete