It seems that photoshopping a photo isn’t a new concept
considering its been going on for more than a 100 years. Photos have a big
impact in our society just like films where it plays into the public’s mind.
However, unlike film, photos are lasting images that can have multiple meanings
conveyed into it in the individual’s eyes. Governments and organizations seem
to understand human nature of perception and thereby “faking” the photos for
their own needs to capture the public mind. Freedom of speech is a wonderful
thing, but it allows these organizations to manipulate us. This fact is perhaps
why we have such nationalism within our country and such ignorance of others
from different countries. For example, one might show a fake photo of an eagle
standing next to the American flag to promote nationalism, but another photo
showing Middle East people protesting angrily showing “hatred”, but in fact its
people protesting against a government that is suppressing them. America’s own
politicians also use photoshopping or misleading titles to get their parties
ahead.
A
photographer may alter a photo for not a political reason, but for an artistic
expression, which also produces a large impact on the public. When president
Obama was running for presidency in 2008, some photographers altered his photo
making him appear almost like a saint not for his political stand points but
for being an inspiration of being the first African-American to reach that
threshold of what is difficult to accomplish. However, when altering photos are
used for money schemes than mistrust is what defines our society such as media.
When we realize that this is a ploy to make us spend so much money on fake
stories and images, we start to mistrust our government doubting ourselves in
what to believe. The old belief that photos can take bits of your soul/ghost
may be true in the perspective of people altering your photo, thus altering
evidence of the past that can lead you baffled.
Syed, the title of your post implies both photographic alteration and the "altar" of photography (something we worship at, at least when it involves the ideal of documentary truth?). Good reflection on the potential for ideological photo doctoring, but be careful not to say that images have been "Photoshopped" for the past century or more, since Photoshop wasn't around until 1990! It's worth remembering that a corporate entity is behind this software that is now a) a verb, and b) cultural shorthand for photographic manipulation (arguably sloppy or obvious image manipulation).
ReplyDelete