A few semesters ago, I took a class on “The Archive”, and
how its particular form impacts our understanding and knowledge of the past. A
section of the class focused on photography. We talked about the role
photographs play in history, how they became accepted as absolute proof of an
event (unlike paintings before them, and digital images after). However,
Batchen adds a new twist to this idea.
Batchen starts by addressing this widely accepted notion,
that photography found cultural success because of its natural ability to
capture a completely truthful picture. But he goes deeper than that, explaining
that a photograph is able to forever etch something’s existence onto the world.
Even images that have been manipulated start at a point of real existence. We
may see photographs of people or things that are no longer found around us, but
that can be certain once existed in the space we now inhabit. Even now, when we
can no longer be sure of the integrity of any given image, we can believe in
the original existence of what we see, although we must take its apparent truth
with a grain of salt.
Furthermore, Batchen talks about the fine line photography
walks between life and death. In one sense, a photograph of a deceased loved
one retains his/her memory and keeps their presence alive. On the other hand, a
photograph signifies, inherently, the stopping of time. It captures a moment
that will always exist in the past, never to exist exactly that way again. Photography
supplies us simultaneously with a sense of “this will be” and “this has been.”
Being the extremely complex medium that it is, photography will never truly be
replaced with newer technology. Like the content it produces, it will always be
and will have been.
I like the way that you have related the Batchen to your class on the archive, and captured the photograph's multiple temporalities. I particularly appreciate this idea that the photograph does not just verify or preserve the existent, but can also bring into being something that may or may not exist in the "real world." Thanks to the computer, many of the images we see today have no real referent, either because they have been created out of whole cloth or because they are composites drawn from disparate times and spaces. But they still have a "reality effect" (see Barthes).
ReplyDelete