Whenever the computer is introduced,
this is seemingly too contemporary to even worth addressing in the classroom.
The mechanical background of figuring out how to make computations with the
difference machines through the use of levers still seems revolutionary and
beyond my own intellectual ability to grasp. However, Thomas Edison never had
not even introduced the use of an electrical system for another 70 years, which
seems even more astonishing when put compared with this high level of
technological innovation.
When Babbage debates how to use a
lever to actually predict the carriage of the 10’s place in the Analytical
Engine, I have to remind myself that he must be thinking similar to a
watchmaker or a mechanic. The transition of these “basic” publications helps to
reflect how the theoretical notion allowed for the “automata theory” from the
1930’s to become even conceivable. To imagine making a machine that performs
decisions based on a numerical order through the use of levers and electricity
must have been a fantastical and purely intellectual endeavor even in the early
20th century. I still find that the transition of these ideas to the
modern computer to be a mystery more than a logical progression of ideas. These
complexly layered discoveries probably explain why this type of technological
history has always been skimmed over in all my history and science classes
growing up.
Glad the readings on Babbage rectified the ahistorical view of technology! I also find it fascinating to think of computers built from analogical or mechanical components (think of the recent fascination with "steampunk"), but of course, even though today's computers are digital in nature, they still have physical components.
ReplyDelete